The US Environmental Protection Agency has just
withdrawn its authorization for a toxic mix of two herbicides,
glyphosate and 2,4-D, to be used on GM crops. The move came in response
to a lawsuit claiming the initial registration was unlawful.
In a welcome victory for environmental
campaigners, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), has announced it
is revoking the registration of Dow's 'Enlist Duo'.
The surprise move came in response to litigation by a coalition of conservation groups seeking to rescind the approval of the dangerous herbicide blend.
Approved by the agency just over a year ago, Enlist Duo is a toxic
combination of glyphosate and 2,4-D that Dow AgroSciences created for
use on the next generation of genetically engineered crops, designed to
withstand being drenched with this potent herbicide cocktail.
In a filing of papers to the court, the EPA stated it is taking this
action after realizing that the combination of these chemicals is likely
significantly more harmful than it had initially believed.
"With this action, EPA confirms the toxic nature of this lethal cocktail of chemicals, and has stepped back from the brink",
said Earthjustice Managing Attorney Paul Achitoff, which filed the suit
for Center for Food Safety, on behalf of Center for Food Safety, Beyond
Pesticides, Center for Biological Diversity, Environmental Working
Group, the National Family Farm Coalition, and Pesticide Action Network
North America.
"Glyphosate is a probable carcinogen and is wiping out the
monarch butterfly, 2,4-D also causes serious human health effects, and
the combination also threatens endangered wildlife. This must not, and
will not, be how we grow our food."
EPA unlawfully failed to look at impact on endangered species
The agency had approved use of Enlist Duo in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa,
Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin, Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota,
Missouri, Mississippi, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and North Dakota, and had
intended to approve it in additional areas in the near future.
Current GMO crops varieties designed for use with the mix include 'Enlist' cotton and soybeans. A group of 35 distinguished scientists wrote to the EPA last July calling on the Agency to refuse authorization citing grave health and environment concerns.
But the coalition challenged EPA's failure to consider the impacts of
Enlist Duo on threatened and endangered plants and animals protected
under the Endangered Species Act. The Act requires that every federal
agency consider the impacts of its actions on our nation's most
imperiled plants and animals and seek input from the expert wildlife
agencies before plunging ahead, which EPA had refused to do.
"EPA is taking a step in the right direction, but Enlist Duo shouldn't have been given the green light in the first place", said Judy Hatcher, executive director of Pesticide Action Network. "Too
often, GE seeds and the herbicides designed to accompany them are
rushed to market without thorough evaluation of their real-world
impacts on community health and farmer livelihoods."
Missouri farmer Margot McMillen added: "I applaud the
Environmental Protection Agency for this action. For many of us, the
right to farm has been lost because there are so many pesticides in the
environment. Many acres of crops have been killed by combinations of
poisons. I hope the EPA takes this opportunity to re-examine all
existing pesticide registrations."
The herbicide treadmill must stop
Dow created Enlist crops as a quick fix for the problem created by
'Roundup Ready' crops, the previous generation of genetically engineered
crops designed to resist the effects of glyphosate, the active
ingredient in Monsanto's Roundup herbicide.
Just as overuse of antibiotics has left resistant strains of bacteria
to thrive, repeated use of Roundup on those crops allowed
glyphosate-resistant 'superweeds' to proliferate, and those weeds now
infest tens of millions of acres of US farmland.
Enlist crops allow farmers to spray both glyphosate and 2,4-D without
killing their crops, and they hope the 'double hit' of herbicides will
kill weeds resistant to glyphosate alone. In fact, some some weeds have
already developed 2,4-D resistance, and its only a matter of time before
resistance to both herbicides combines in a single weed.
As the 35 scientists wrote, "If
the EPA were to approve Dow's application for 2,4-D-glyphosate
herbicide to be used on 2,4-D-resistant crops, USDA estimates at least a
tripling of use of 2,4-D by 2020 compared to the present amounts used
annually for agriculture in the United States ...
In addition to putting human health at risk, increased 2,4-D
spraying would harm the already-vulnerable ecosystems in intensely
farmed regions of the United States; affect dozens of endangered
species; and potentially contribute to the decline of pollinators and
honeybees ... Finally, increased 2,4-D application is likely to accelerate and exacerbate the evolution of yet more 2,4-D resistant weeds."
George Kimbrell, Center for Food Safety's senior attorney, said:"The
decision by EPA to withdraw the illegally approved Enlist Duo crops is a
huge victory for the environment and the future of our food. We will remain vigilant to ensure industry does not pressure the agency into making the same mistake in the future."
"This Thanksgiving, I am thankful for EPA taking this important
action to protect people, rare plants, and animals from Enlist Duo", said Lori Ann Burd, Environmental Health director at the Center for Biological Diversity.
"As we gather with our families for the holiday feast, we can all
breathe a little bit easier knowing that EPA has protected our food
from being drenched with this poisonous pesticide cocktail."
No comments:
Post a Comment